<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s About the Design Not the Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designm.ag/design/its-about-the-design-not-the-tools-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designm.ag/design/its-about-the-design-not-the-tools-2/</link>
	<description>Articles and Resources for Web Designers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debate popular-Julio</title>
		<link>http://designm.ag/design/its-about-the-design-not-the-tools-2/#comment-51654</link>
		<dc:creator>Debate popular-Julio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designm.ag/?p=35088#comment-51654</guid>
		<description>In fact the tools are a supplement that has to do with the ease of use of the designer. Obviously the design mostly should not be thought by the designer but by what the customer needs and what the user intends for the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact the tools are a supplement that has to do with the ease of use of the designer. Obviously the design mostly should not be thought by the designer but by what the customer needs and what the user intends for the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design Manchester</title>
		<link>http://designm.ag/design/its-about-the-design-not-the-tools-2/#comment-40222</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design Manchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 09:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designm.ag/?p=35088#comment-40222</guid>
		<description>Hello there. Great examples and tips. I really loved them. Actually, the examples were the best ones that i have seen in a while. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there. Great examples and tips. I really loved them. Actually, the examples were the best ones that i have seen in a while. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kole Calchera</title>
		<link>http://designm.ag/design/its-about-the-design-not-the-tools-2/#comment-39979</link>
		<dc:creator>Kole Calchera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 21:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designm.ag/?p=35088#comment-39979</guid>
		<description>I dugg some of you post as I  cerebrated they were  very helpful   handy  - Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.  Abraham Lincoln 1809 1865</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dugg some of you post as I  cerebrated they were  very helpful   handy  &#8211; Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.  Abraham Lincoln 1809 1865</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Barnette</title>
		<link>http://designm.ag/design/its-about-the-design-not-the-tools-2/#comment-38978</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Barnette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 17:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designm.ag/?p=35088#comment-38978</guid>
		<description>I agree completely, though on a different tip. When I first started I didn&#039;t have fancy hardware or software like Photoshop for our design projects. But we did just fine. Whenever someone in the industry asked what we use, there was always a bit of awkwardness because we didn&#039;t use the &quot;industry standard&quot; and we felt we&#039;d be looked down on for that. It shouldn&#039;t have mattered, because the end design and how it functions for the client is what matters (or should matter) most. 

Now I actually prefer Illustrator and occasionally Fireworks. We don&#039;t really have a need for Dreamweaver or similar programs. We just consider the design and its goals to determine which software to work in or which tools to use. And of course, if the client needs specific file formats that goes into consideration as well.

But even though it shouldn&#039;t matter, it does. I&#039;ve seen so many job postings and ads for clients needing a designer who is proficient in Dreamweaver or Photoshop. It&#039;s not that the client has a website currently designed in one of those tools because most that I&#039;ve seen doesn&#039;t even have a website yet. But I think that clients hear the names of certain software and assume that they won&#039;t get a good website if it&#039;s not designed with these tools. That couldn&#039;t be further from the truth, but try to tell them that and they&#039;ll just assume you&#039;re taking that position because you don&#039;t have the level of skill that they&#039;re looking for.

Perhaps it&#039;s client education we need to help others understand that the tools aren&#039;t really what matters as long as the outcome of the design is spot on. Whether it&#039;s Photoshop, Fireworks or something else not considered &quot;industry standard,&quot; the design should beat all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely, though on a different tip. When I first started I didn&#8217;t have fancy hardware or software like Photoshop for our design projects. But we did just fine. Whenever someone in the industry asked what we use, there was always a bit of awkwardness because we didn&#8217;t use the &#8220;industry standard&#8221; and we felt we&#8217;d be looked down on for that. It shouldn&#8217;t have mattered, because the end design and how it functions for the client is what matters (or should matter) most. </p>
<p>Now I actually prefer Illustrator and occasionally Fireworks. We don&#8217;t really have a need for Dreamweaver or similar programs. We just consider the design and its goals to determine which software to work in or which tools to use. And of course, if the client needs specific file formats that goes into consideration as well.</p>
<p>But even though it shouldn&#8217;t matter, it does. I&#8217;ve seen so many job postings and ads for clients needing a designer who is proficient in Dreamweaver or Photoshop. It&#8217;s not that the client has a website currently designed in one of those tools because most that I&#8217;ve seen doesn&#8217;t even have a website yet. But I think that clients hear the names of certain software and assume that they won&#8217;t get a good website if it&#8217;s not designed with these tools. That couldn&#8217;t be further from the truth, but try to tell them that and they&#8217;ll just assume you&#8217;re taking that position because you don&#8217;t have the level of skill that they&#8217;re looking for.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s client education we need to help others understand that the tools aren&#8217;t really what matters as long as the outcome of the design is spot on. Whether it&#8217;s Photoshop, Fireworks or something else not considered &#8220;industry standard,&#8221; the design should beat all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.047 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 409/414 objects using memcached

 Served from: designm.ag @ 2013-05-24 07:12:41 by W3 Total Cache -->